9. For people in States of the Union, the Internal Revenue Code does not have the force of law,
30
but instead is only “code” and a state sponsored franchise and religion
31
According to the legislative notes under 1 U.S.C. §204, the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26, is NOT enacted into “positive
32
law” and only constitutes “prima facie” or “presumed” law. The U.S. Supreme Court held in Vlandis v. Kline that all
33
presumption which prejudices constitutionally guaranteed rights is unconstitutional:
34
(1) [8:4993] Conclusive presumptions affecting protected interests: A conclusive presumption [that a “code”
35
is in fact a “law”, for instance] may be defeated where its application would impair a party’s constitutionally-
36
protected liberty or property interests. In such cases, conclusive presumptions have been held to violate a party’s
37
due process and equal protection rights. [Vlandis v. Kline (1973) 412 U.S. 441, 449, 93 S.Ct. 2230, 2235;
38
Cleveland Bed. of Ed. v. LaFleur (1974) 414 U.S. 632, 639-640, 94 S.Ct. 1208, 1215-presumption under Illinois
39
law that unmarried fathers are unfit violates process]40
[Federal Civil Trials and Evidence, Rutter Group, paragraph 8:4993, p. 8K-34]41
Therefore, those protected by the Bill of Rights may not lawfully have “prima facie law”, meaning “presumption”, cited
42
against them as evidence in any court and if a judge permits this, he is violating his oath to support and defend the Constitution.
43
In fact, the American Jurisprudence Legal Encyclopedia 2d definitively says that presumption may not be used as a
44
SUBSTITUTE for evidence:
45
American Jurisprudence 2d
46
Evidence, §181
47
A presumption is neither evidence nor a substitute for evidence. 61 Properly used, the term “presumption” is a
48
rule of law directing that if a party proves certain facts (the “basic facts”) at a trial or hearing, the factfinder
49
61 Levasseur v. Field (Me) 332 A.2d. 765; Hinds v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 155 Me 349, 155 A.2d. 721, 85 ALR2d 703 (superseded by statute
on other grounds as stated in Poitras v. R. E. Glidden Body Shop, Inc. (Me) 430 A.2d. 1113); Connizzo v. General American Life Ins. Co. (Mo App) 520
SW2d 661.
Federal and State Tax Withholding Options for Private Employers
267
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship , http://famguardian.org/
Ver. 2.12
EXHIBIT:_____________
must also accept an additional fact (the “presumed fact”) as proven unless sufficient evidence is introduced
1
tending to rebut the presumed fact. 62 In a sense, therefore, a presumption is an inference which is mandatory
2
unless rebutted. 63
3
The underlying purpose and impact of a presumption is to affect the burden of going forward. 64 Depending
4
upon a variety of factors, a presumption may shift the burden of production as to the presumed fact, or may shift
5
both the burden of production and the burden of persuasion. 65
6
A few states have codified some of the more common presumptions in their evidence codes.663 Often a statute
7
will provide that a fact or group of facts is prima facie evidence of another fact. 67 Courts frequently recognize
8
this principle in the absence of an explicit legislative directive. 68
9
The above implies that at least for people domiciled in states of the Union and protected by the Bill of Rights:
10
1. The Internal Revenue Code cannot be described as “law” or cited against them in any court, but instead is instead simply
11
a “Code”, or a “Title”, but not “law”. It is as “foreign” to a person domiciled in a state of the Union as the laws of
12
communist China are, in fact.
13
2. Citing the I.R.C. does not relieve the moving party, which is usually the government, of the burden of proving that the
14
sections of the code they are citing were enacted into positive law, and if they can’t prove it, they have no standing to
15
proceed in the case and the case must be dismissed.
16
3. Those who have had the code cited against them and do not challenge such a false presumption indirectly are implying
17
that they consent individually to be subject to it and are therefore “taxpayers”.
18
4. Those persons domiciled in states of the Union who cite any provision of the I.R.C. as their basis to proceed are admitting
19
that they are “taxpayers” subject to it. Here is what the U.S. Supreme Court said on this subject:
20
“The Government urges that the Power Company is estopped to question the validity of the Act creating the
21
Tennessee Valley Authority, and hence that the stockholders, suing in the right of the corporation, cannot [297
22
U.S. 323] maintain this suit. ….. The principle is invoked that one who accepts the benefit of a statute cannot
23
be heard to question its constitutionality. Great Falls Manufacturing Co. v. Attorney General, 124 U.S. 581;
24
Wall v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co., 244 U.S. 407; St. Louis Casting Co. v. Prendergast Construction Co., 260
25
U.S. 469.“
26
[Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 297 U.S. 288 (1936)]27
________________________________________________________________________________________
28
“…when a State willingly accepts a substantial benefit from the Federal Government [including a law of the
29
Federal Government], it waives its immunity under the Eleventh Amendment and consents to suit by the intended
30
beneficiaries of that federal assistance.”
31
[Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265 (1986)]32
Below is the definition of “positive law” from the law dictionary which helps underscore these very important point.
33
“Positive law. Law actually and specifically enacted or adopted [approved and consented to] by proper authority
34
for the government [We the People] of an organized jural society. See also Legislation.”
35
[Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1162]36
62 Inferences and presumptions are a staple of our adversary system of factfinding, since it is often necessary for the trier of fact to determine the existence
of an element of a crime–that is an ultimate or elemental fact–from the existence of one or more evidentiary or basic facts. County Court of Ulster County
v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140, 60 L.Ed.2d. 777, 99 S.Ct. 2213.
63 Legille v. Dann, 178 U.S. App DC 78, 544 F.2d. 1, 191 USPQ 529; Murray v. Montgomery Ward Life Ins. Co., 196 Colo 225, 584 P.2d. 78; Re Estate
of Borom (Ind App) 562 N.E.2d. 772; Manchester v. Dugan (Me) 247 A.2d. 827; Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co., 22 N.J. 482, 126 A.2d. 323, 62
ALR2d 1179; Smith v. Bohlen, 95 NC App 347, 382 S.E.2d. 812, affd 328 NC 564, 402 S.E.2d. 380; Larmay v. Van Etten, 129 Vt 368, 278 A.2d. 736;
Martin v. Phillips, 235 Va 523, 369 S.E.2d. 397.
64 FRE Rule 301.
65 §198.
66 California Evidence Code §§ 621 et seq.; Hawaii Rules of Evidence, Rules 303, 304; Oregon Evidence Code, Rule 311.
67 California Evidence Code § 602; Alaska Rule of Evidence, Rule 301(b); Hawaii Rule of Evidence, Rule 305; Maine Rule of Evidence, Rule 301(b);
Oregon Rule of Evidence, Rule 311(2); Vermont Rule of Evidence, Rule 301(b); Wisconsin Rule of Evidence, Rule 301.
68 American Casualty Co. v. Costello, 174 Mich App 1, 435 NW2d 760; Glover v. Henry (Tex App Eastland) 749 SW2d 502.
Federal and State Tax Withholding Options for Private Employers
268
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship , http://famguardian.org/
Ver. 2.12
EXHIBIT:_____________
“Proper authority” above is the people’s elected representatives, because all power in this country derives from We The
1
People.
2
“In the United States, sovereignty resides in the people…the Congress cannot invoke sovereign power of the
3
People to override their will as thus declared.”
4
[Perry v. U.S., 294 U.S. 330 (1935)]5
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law…While sovereign
6
powers are delegated to…the government, sovereignty itself remains with the people.”
7
[Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)]8
Since the people domiciled in the states of the Union never enacted the Internal Revenue Code into “positive law”, they as
9
the “sovereigns” in our system of government never consented to enforce it upon themselves collectively. “Positive law” is
10
the only legally admissible evidence that the people ever explicitly consented to enforcement actions by their government of
11
a law, because legislation can only become positive law by a majority of the representatives of the sovereign people voting
12
(consenting) to enact the law. Since the people never consented, then the “code” cannot be enforced against the general
13
public. The Declaration of Independence says that all just powers of government derive from the “consent” of the governed.
14
Anything not consensual is, ipso facto, unjust by implication. In fact, the sovereign People REPEALED, not ENACTED the
15
Internal Revenue Code. It has been nothing but a repealed law since 1939, in fact. An examination of the Statutes at Large,
16
53 Stat 1, Section 4, reveals that the Internal Revenue Code and all prior revenue laws were REPEALED. See:
17
18
Revenue Act of 1939, 53 Stat. 1, SEDM Exhibit #05.027
http://sedm.org/Exhibits/ExhibitIndex.htm
Notice that we aren’t trying to imply here any of the following very false conclusions:
19
1. That the Internal Revenue Code is not “law” for people domiciled in the District of Columbia or working for the U.S.
20
government. It absolutely is.
21
2. That there are no persons subject to the Internal Revenue Code.
22
3. That Subtitle A of the I.R.C. doesn’t apply to anyone. Rather, the group of persons who are subject to it is far more
23
limited than most people realize.
24
4. That “taxpayers” are not subject to the Internal Revenue Code.
25
5. That there are no “taxpayers”.
26
If the Internal Revenue Code is not “law” or “positive law” for people domiciled in states of the Union, then every regulation
27
that implements it does not have the force of “law” either. Consequently, the “code” and the regulations that implement it
28
are nothing but a state-sponsored official religion not unlike the early Anglican Church was. It is what we call a “political
29
religion” in violation of the First Amendment, where:
30
1. This false and evil religion meets all the criteria for being described as a “cult”, because:
31
1.1. The cult imposes strict rules of conduct that are thousands of pages long and which are far more restrictive than
32
any other religious cult.
33
1.2. Participating in it is harmful to our rights, liberty, and property.
34
1.3. The “cult” is perpetuated by keeping the truth secret from its members. Our Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302
35
contains 2,000 pages of secrets that our public servants and the federal judiciary have done their best to keep
36
cleverly hidden and obscured from public view and discourse. When these secrets come out in federal courtrooms,
37
the judges make the case unpublished so the American people can’t learn the truth about the misdeeds of their
38
servants in government. Don’t believe us? Read the proof for yourself:
39
http://www.nonpublication.com/
40
1.4. Those who try to abandon this harmful cult are threatened and harassed illegally and unconstitutionally by covetous
41
public dis-servants.
42
2. The “bible” of this false religious “cult” is the “Infernal (Satanic) Revenue Code”
43
3. The U.S. Congress are the false “prophets”, who wrote their “bible” to serve their own private political agenda.
44
4. People join the cult mainly in order to minimize their liability for persecution from the enforcement unit for the cult,
45
which is the IRS.
46
5. The courtroom is where “worship services” are held. Even the seats are the same as church pews!
47
6. Tax preparation businesses all over the country like H.R. Block are where “confession” is held annually to “deacons” of
48
the cult.
49
Federal and State Tax Withholding Options for Private Employers
269
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship , http://famguardian.org/
Ver. 2.12
EXHIBIT:_____________
7. The judges are the false “god” of this religion, who rule by their own might and ignore the limits of the Constitution, at
1
least in the context of taxation. Attorneys “worship” these false gods.
2
8. The judge, like the church pastor, wears a black robe and chants in Latin. Many legal maxims are Latin phrases that
3
have no meaning to the average citizen, which is the very same thing that happens in Catholic churches daily across the
4
country.
5
9. The jury are the twelve disciples of the judge, rather than of the Truth or the law or their conscience. Their original
6
purpose was as a check on government abuse and usurpation, but judges steer them away from ruling in such a manner
7
and being gullible sheep raised in the public “fool” system, they comply to their own injury.
8
9.1. Those who are not already members of the cult are not allowed to serve on juries. The judge or the judge’s
9
henchmen, his “licensed attorneys” who are “officers of the court”, dismiss prospective jurists who are not cult
10
members during the voir dire (jury selection) phase of the tax trial. The qualifications that prospective jurists must
11
meet in order to be part of the “cult” are at least one of the following:
12
9.1.1. They collect government benefits based on income taxes and don’t want to see those benefits reduced or
13
stopped. The only people who can collect federal benefits under enacted law and the Constitution are federal
14
employees. Therefore, they must be federal employees. Since jurists are acting as “voters”, then receipt of
15
any federal benefits makes them into a biased jury in the context of income taxes and violates 18 U.S.C. §597,
16
which makes it illegal to bribe a voter. The only way to eliminate this conflict of interest is to permanently
17
remove public assistance or to recuse/disqualify them as jurists.
18
9.1.2. They faithfully pay what they “think” are “income taxes”. They are blissfully unaware that in actuality, the
19
1040 return is a federal employment profit and loss statement.
20
9.1.3. They believe or have “faith” in the cult’s “bible”, which is the Infernal Revenue Code and falsely believe it is
21
“law”. Instead, 1 U.S.C. §204 legislative notes says it is NOT positive law, but simply “presumed” to be law.
22
Presumption is a violation of due process and therefore illegal under the Sixth Amendment.
23
9.1.4. They are ignorant of the law and were made so in a public school. They therefore must believe whatever any
24
judge or attorney tells them about “law”. This means they will make a good lemming to jump off the cliff
25
with the fellow citizen who is being tried.
26
9.2. Juries are FORBIDDEN in every federal courthouse in the country from entering the law library while serving on
27
a jury because judges don’t want jurists reading the law and finding out that judges are misrepresenting it in the
28
courtroom. Don’t believe us? Then call the law library in any federal court building and ask them if jurists are
29
allowed to go in there and read the law while they are serving. Below are the General Order 228C for the Federal
30
District Court in San Diego proving that jurors are not allowed to use the court law library while serving. Notice
31
jurors are not listed as authorized to use the library in this order:
32
http://famguardian.org/Disks/TaxDVD/Evidence/JudicialCorruption/GenOrder228C-Library.pdf
33
9.3. Unlike every other type of federal trial, judges forbid discussing the law in a tax trial. Could it be because we don’t
34
have any and he doesn’t want to admit it?
35
9.4. Public (government) schools deliberately don’t teach law or the Constitution either, so that the public become sheep
36
that the government can shear and rape and pillage.
37
9.5. Federal judges also warn juries these days NOT to vote on their conscience, as juries originally did and were
38
encouraged to do. He does this to steer or direct the jury to do his illegal and unconstitutional dirty work. He turns
39
the jury effectively into an angry lynch mob and thereby maliciously abuses legal process for his own personal
40
benefit in violation of 18 U.S.C. §208. He helps get the jury angry at the defendant by giving them the idea that
41
their “tax” bill will be bigger because the defendant refuses to “pay their fair share”.
42
10. Those who refuse to worship the false god and false religion (which the Bible describes in the Book of Revelations as
43
“the Beast”) are “exorcised” from society by being put into jail so that they don’t spread the truth about the total lack of
44
lawful authority to institute income taxation within states of the Union. They are jailed as political prisoners by
45
communist judges and socialist fellow citizens, just like in the Soviet Union. You can read more about this at:
46
http://famguardian.org/Publications/SocialSecurity/TOC.htm
47
11. The lawyers representing both sides are licensed by the priest/judge and therefore will pay homage to and cooperate with
48
him fully or risk losing their livelihood and becoming homeless. Every tax trial has THREE prosecutors who are there
49
to prosecute you: your defense attorney, the opposing U.S. attorney, and the judge, all of whom are on the take. Attorneys
50
have a conflict of interest and it is therefore impossible for them to objectively satisfy the fiduciary duty to their clients
51
which they have under the law. You can read more about this scam at:
52
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/LegalEthics/PetForAdmToPractice-USDC.pdf
53
12. The capitol, Washington D.C., is the “political temple” or headquarters of this false religious cult. Don’t believe us?
54
During the Congressional debates of the Sixteenth Amendment in 1909, one Congressman amazingly admitted as much.
55
The Sixteenth Amendment is the income tax amendment that was later fraudulently ratified in 1913. Notice the use of
56
the words “civic temple” and “faith” in his statement, which are no accident.
57
Federal and State Tax Withholding Options for Private Employers
270
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship , http://famguardian.org/
Ver. 2.12
EXHIBIT:_____________
“Now, Mr. Speaker, this Capitol is the civic temple of the people, and we are here by direction of the people to
1
reduce the tariff tax and enact a law in the interest of all the people. This was the expressed will of the people at
2
the polls, and you promised to carry out that will, but you have not kept faith with the American people.”
3
[44 Cong.Rec. 4420, July 12, 1909; Congressman Heflin talking about the enactment of the Sixteenth
4
Amendment]5
If you want to read the above amazing admission for yourself, visit our website at:
6
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/History/Congress/1909-16thAmendCongrRecord.pdf
7
13. Representatives of this church/cult, such as the Department of Justice and the IRS, dress the same as Mormon
8
missionaries.
9
14. Those who participate in this cult can write-off or deduct their contributions just like donations to any church. State
10
income taxes, for instances, are deductible from federal gross income.
11
15. The false god/idol called government gets the “first fruits” of our labor, before the Lord even gets one dime, using payroll
12
deductions. Some employers treat the payroll deduction program like it is a law to be followed religiously, even though
13
it is not. This is a violation of Prov. 3:9, which says:
14
“Honor the LORD with your possessions, And with the firstfruits of all your increase;”
15
[Prov. 3:9, Bible, NKJV]16
Yes, people, the government has made itself into a religion, at least in the realm of taxation. The problem with this corruption
17
of our government is that the U.S. Supreme Court said they cannot do it:
18
“The “establishment of religion” clause of the First Amendment means at least this: neither a state nor the
19
Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one [state-sponsored political]20
religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force or influence a person to go to
21
or to remain away from church against his will, or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No
22
person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or
23
non-attendance. No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or
24
institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion.
25
Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious
26
organizations or groups and vice versa.”
27
[Everson v. Bd. of Ed., 330 U.S. 1, 15 (1947)]28
__________________________________________________________________________________________
29
“[T]he Establishment Clause is infringed when the government makes adherence to religion relevant to a
30
person’s standing in the political community. Direct government action endorsing religion or a particular
31
religious practice is invalid under this approach, because it sends a message to nonadherents that they are
32
outsiders, not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to adherents that they are
33
insiders, favored members of the political community”.
34
[Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 69 (1985)]35
If you would like additional hard evidence supporting the above fascinating scientific conclusion, then please read the
36
following supporting evidence:
37
1. Socialism: The New American Civil Religion, Form #05.016:
38
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
39
2. The Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302 book available free at:
40
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm
41
2.1. Section 4.3.2: Biblical view of taxation and government
42
2.2. Section 4.3.12: Our Government has become idolatry and a false religion
43
2.3. Sections 5.4 through 5.4.3.6: The I.R.C. is not law
44
3. Tax Deposition Questions, Section 5: First Amendment and Socialism
45
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/Forms/Discovery/Deposition/Deposition.htm
46
4. The Unlimited Liability Universe, Family Guardian Fellowship:
47
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Spirituality/Articles/UnlimitedLiabilityUniverse.htm
48
5. Government is a Pagan Cult and We’ve all Been drinking the Kool-Aid, Family Guardian Fellowship:
49
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/ChurchVState/GovtPaganCult.htm
50
6. How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government, Family Guardian Fellowship:
51
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/HowScCorruptOurRepubGovt.htm
52
The only reasons anyone follows a repealed law as though it were a false religion is one of the following:
53
Federal and State Tax Withholding Options for Private Employers
271
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship , http://famguardian.org/
Ver. 2.12
EXHIBIT:_____________
1. They are dangerously stupid
1
2. They want to be part of the official state sponsored religion and be “politically correct”.
2
3. They are more afraid of what a corrupted tyrant judge with a conflict of interest will do to them than what God will to
3
them for disobeying His laws. God’s laws say we cannot be slaves to any man and that we cannot worship false gods or
4
“priests” of false gods such as tyrant judges who are perpetuating the worship and obedience to socialism and humanism.
5
We call this religion the “Civil Religion of Socialism and Humanism”. One of the reasons why the I.R.C. does not have the
6
FORCE of law for the average American and can never be PUBLIC law that applies equally to ALL in a free country is that
7
the First Amendment prohibits establishing religion by law. Therefore, Congress wrote a “proposal” or contract called the
8
Internal Revenue Code and then duped everyone into accepting the contract by sending in the wrong tax forms to the IRS.
9
Compliance is then maintained by “judge made law”, because Congress put the federal judiciary under the control of the IRS
10
for the first time starting in 1932. The judges rebelled, but Congress was so sneaky how they did it that the Supreme Court
11
couldn’t stop them. From that point on, the judges would be destroyed by the IRS if they didn’t rule in the IRS’ favor69. The
12
First Amendment doesn’t prohibit the judiciary from establishing a religion, and that is exactly what these corrupted judges
13
have done under the influence of IRS extortion. Remember what the Declaration of Independence says on this subject and
14
the complaint we had about the British King that caused us to rebel? Well the very same problem is again back in our midst:
15
“He has made Judges dependent on his [the Executive Branch/President and the IRS he controls] Will alone,
16
for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
17
”He has erected a multitude of New [IRS] Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,
18
and eat out their substance.”
19
[SOURCE: http://www.archives.gov/national_archives_experience/charters/declaration_transcript.html]20
What are YOU going to do about this cancer on the body politic, folks? America will only be the land of the free as long as
21
it is the home of the brave. The Ten Commandments say “Thou shalt not steal.” They don’t say “Thou shalt not steal
22
UNLESS you are the government.” We realize that some of this section may sound strange and maybe even radical at first
23
glance, but we scientifically prove all assertions made here using the government’s own laws and court rulings in sections
24
5.4.3.2 and 5.4.3.6 of the Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302 book available below. We encourage you to read the eye-popping
25
truth for yourself and rebut it if you can. Don’t believe a word we say, but read the law for yourself:
26
Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm
Instead, the I.R.C. can only be enforced against groups of people whose consent is not required. The only group of people
27
that fits that description are federal “employees”, contractors, agencies, and benefit recipients. This is confirmed by
28
examining the Federal Register Act, 44 U.S.C. §1505(a)(1) and the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §553(a), both
29
of which confirm that no enforcement implementing regulations are required in the case of the following persons, who in fact
30
are the only proper or lawful subject of the Internal Revenue Code Subtitle A:
31
1. 44 U.S.C. §1505(a)(1): Federal agencies or persons in their capacity as officers, agents, or employees
32
2. 5 U.S.C. §553(a)(1): Military or foreign affairs function of the United States
33
3. 5 U.S.C. §553(a)(2): Matters relating to agency management or personnel or to public property, loans, grants, benefits,
34
or contracts
35
The following document proves that there are no enforcement implementing regulations and that the only group the IRS can
36
enforce the I.R.C. against are federal instrumentalities, agencies, contractors, and benefit recipients:
37
IRS Due Process Meeting Handout, Form #03.008
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Therefore, the above groups are the only proper subject of I.R.C. Subtitle A, the personal and business income tax. Subtitle
38
A of the Internal Revenue Code therefore amounts to an implied employment agreement between the United States
39
government and the federal “employees” and contractors and agencies who work for it. Those who don’t want to consent to
40
the employment or contract simply will do so by not seeking federal employment or contracts. Those who work for the
41
69 See O’Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1938) and Great IRS Hoax, Section 6.9.9.
Federal and State Tax Withholding Options for Private Employers
272
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship , http://famguardian.org/
Ver. 2.12
EXHIBIT:_____________
federal government, by virtue of being granted the privilege, must refund a portion of their paycheck back to the government.
1
The amount returned is the “tax” and the “gross income” upon which it is based is all the earnings from the public office,
2
which is called “income effectively connected with a trade or business in the United States” under the I.R.C. That is why
3
what you file at the end of every year is called a “return”. There is a very good reason it is called a “return”! Those who
4
receive this government “overpayment”, while it is temporarily in their possession, are treated as “transferees” and fiduciaries
5
of the federal government until the money is returned to its rightful owner. What this scheme amounts to essentially is a
6
“federal employee kickback program” disguised to look like a lawful income tax. The reason this type of deception was
7
necessary is because the Constitution forbids direct taxes in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3.
8
Therefore, the government took the back door to deceive the people so they could literally STEAL their money under the
9
pretext of lawful authority. The scam started in 1862 and was instituted as an “emergency measure” to pay for the civil war,
10
but it survives to this day to plague us. Since that time, the scoundrels have taken great pains to obfuscate IRS Forms,
11
publications, and the Internal Revenue Code to fool the average person into believing that they are what amounts to “public
12
employees” under the I.R.C and thereby expand the operation of the “scheme”. See the following for more complete details
13
on this monumental scam.
14
Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302, Section 5.6.10
http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm
Don’t believe us? We’ve got a signed admission by the government’s own employees that this is the case. See:
15
16
Cynthia Mills Letter, SEDM Exhibit #09.023
http://sedm.org/Exhibits/ExhibitIndex.htm
If you would like to know more about the content of this section, please consult the following memorandum of law below:
17
Requirement for Consent, Form #05.003
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
10. Federal Tax Scheme